Title(s): Godzilla
/ The Quiet Ones / The Amazing Spider-Man 2
Date of Theatrical Release(s): May 16, 2014 / April 25, 2014 / May 2, 2014
MPAA Rating: PG-13
(all)
On the 16th of May, your friendly ol’ Unimonster
loaded the family truckster with food, drink, blankets, the Uni-Nephew, and the
Rug-Monkey, and headed out to the local Drive-In. Our primary goal for the night was to have a
great time watching the new Godzilla film, but good timing (plus a little bit
of relocating from one screen to the next during intermission) allowed us to
score a triple-feature of genre films.
It was also my first chance to check out the Tibbs since they upgraded
to Digital over the off-season.
Since the boys and I watched these movies as a team, we’ll
review them as a team. Each review will
include their thoughts on the film in question.
So let’s go to the Drive-in!
Godzilla
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0cb34/0cb34b7f0fb4228301241765740937253700355e" alt=""
We were all looking forward to Gareth Edwards’
Godzilla, the big budget reinvention of
the King of all Monsters. Following a
spring filled with hype about this movie, we were all a little concerned that
it might fail to deliver as much as was promised … I more so than the
boys. I still have vivid recollections
of the last time the Big G appeared on American shores, in the 1998 Roland
Emmerich-directed GINO (
Godzilla … In
Name Only) stinkfest. It too had been
massively hyped, only to disappoint legions of loyal
Kaijû fans, including the Unimonster. I hoped history wouldn’t repeat itself, but
Hollywood has a poor track record in this area.
After viewing, all I can say is … this movie was
fantastic! For once, the hype wasn’t
overdone; if anything, the movie was better than I expected. This is Godzilla; Americanized, sure … but
still recognizable as the Big G. If the
trailers mislead on any point, it’s the impression that Bryan Cranston is the
star of the film. His performance as Joe
Brody, the first to give warning of Godzilla’s presence is good, and the
character is important to the plot, but his screen time is limited. Never having seen an episode of Breaking Bad, my impressions of Cranston
all revolve around his Emmy-nominated role of Hal, Malcolm’s long-suffering
father on the hit series Malcolm in the
Middle. It’s different seeing him in
a dramatic role; good, but different. I
kept expecting Hal to pop-up.
The lead is nominally Aaron Taylor-Johnson, familiar to
genre fans as Dave Lizewski / Kick-Ass, from Kick-Ass and Kick-Ass 2 (both highly recommended, btw), but make
no mistake, the star of this film is 250 feet tall and scaly. This is Godzilla’s film, and though I
would’ve like to see more of him on-screen, his impact is unquestionable.
The one problem I do have with the film is that far too much
of it looks as though it was lit with a 40-watt light bulb. I understand using shadows to conceal
something in order to build suspense, but in order for there to be shadows
there must also be light. When you’re
seeing one- or two-minute sequences that are essentially just a black screen,
that’s not building suspense; that’s taking the audience out of the action.
Still, that’s my one complaint, and it’s not a major
one. Overall, it’s a tremendous movie,
and easily vaults to the top of my list for Movie of the Year.
The Uni-Nephew’s Review: “Godzilla was a great movie, with lots of action and a great story!”
The Rug-Monkey’s Review: “Great!”
The Quiet Ones
Ever since the resurrection of Hammer Films, and their first
unqualified success with The Woman in
Black, I’ve been waiting for the follow-up.
Something, anything, to show that the studio’s new incarnation was for real. The
Quiet Ones, the studio’s first release since The Woman in Black, is not that film.
Starring Jared Harris, Sam Claflin, and Olivia Cooke, The Quiet Ones is the type of
Supernatural / Psychological horror that Hammer used to do very well, with films
such as 1963’s Paranoiac or 1964’s Nightmare. My issues with this film are that, for a
“Horror” film, there’s a distinct lack of … well, Horror. To describe the film
as slow-moving would be an understatement; the movie plods along with the
deliberateness of a stagnant creek. John
Pogue directed this tortoise of a film, working from a script he co-wrote with
Craig Rosenberg and Oren Moverman. I
don’t know if ‘glacial’ was the pace he was shooting for … if so, then he hit
the mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a207/9a207ebb9fb2436783b88707de97ada5143d3d48" alt=""
The characters are on the whole unlikeable; Claflin’s Brian
McNeil is the closest you get to a hero for the piece, though not a very
effective one. Professor Joseph Coupland
(Harris), the head of the group, is the perfect example of the ‘creepy uncle’,
the kind which parents don’t let their kids visit unsupervised. Only Cooke, as Jane Harper, the subject of
the Professor’s experiments, is entertaining.
And I get the impression that that’s an accidental occurrence.
Despite all this, The
Quiet Ones isn't a horrible movie … just a profoundly disappointing one.
The Uni-Nephew’s Review: “The Quiet Ones was a good movie but could’ve been a bit faster-paced, with more horror
aspects to it (considering it’s a horror movie).”
The Rug-Monkey’s Review: “The Quiet Ones was okay, but wasn’t what I expected.”
The Amazing Spider-Man 2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c710/3c7101827dbf4b6be66c56851e956f818533a3be" alt=""
Okay, confession time … I’ve never been a fan of Marvel’s
Superheroes (DC all the WAY!), and Spider-Man was always my least favorite of
the bunch. Still, the recent Marvel
blockbusters have made me a (partial) convert—with one exception: Spidey.
To this old comic-book lovin’ Unimonster, he still comes across as comical,
almost a parody of superheroes.
Truthfully, I fell asleep during the last big-screen adaptation of Stan
Lee’s most famous creation, and expected to do the same with this one. No one was more surprised than I that, not
only did I make it through the entire film (though some credit has to go to
having two rambunctious teenagers in a tightly enclosed space … think ‘pair of
chimps in a Gemini space capsule’), I actually enjoyed the movie.
Granted, I know next to nothing of the character’s back
story, or the various comic-book iterations of it that exist. Andrew Garfield did a very good job playing
Spider-Man, but more importantly, he did a great job playing Peter Parker, the
harder of the two roles. To be the
superhero, the man or woman in the mask, cape, or tights, is easy. It’s all action. All one has to do is be heroic. It’s as their secret selves that you see the
cost of being the hero, as with Christian Bale’s Bruce Wayne.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e644/7e6444f09ed6b2292daf104f250c71381c19f2f9" alt=""
Emma Stone (Garfield’s real-life girlfriend) plays Gwen
Stacy, the love-interest of Parker / Spider-Man, as she is aware of his
secret. This threw me at first, as the
little that I do recall of the comic book Spider-Man was that his girlfriend
was named Mary Jane, but I was enlightened as to the discrepancy by the
boys. Stone gives a very good
performance, and there’s no denying that she’s one of the most beautiful
actresses in Hollywood.
The cast overall does an excellent job, aided by a superb
script from Alex Kurtzman, Roberto Orci, and Jeff Pinkner. Kurtzman and Orci have been one of the most
successful screenwriting duos of the last decade, penning the Transformers, Spider-Man, and Star Trek franchises to box-office
gold. Marc Webb does well as director;
though to be honest, with this level of talent on board, it would be hard not
to.
While Spider-Man will never be a favorite Superhero of mine,
not even my favorite Marvel hero, this movie surprised me in just how much I
enjoyed it.
The Uni-Nephew’s Review: “The Amazing Spider-Man 2 was a very good movie. It has many twists to it, and a very good
story.”
The Rug-Monkey’s Review: “The Amazing Spider-Man 2 was really amazing!”
One final word on the Tibbs Drive-In’s digital upgrade is in
order. The picture quality was very
good, not as vast an improvement as you would see in a similar upgrade in a
conventional theater, but that’s a function of the limited amount of light that
can be projected onto the screen when that screen is a hundred or more yards
away from the projector, as opposed to a hundred or so feet. Still, I mourn the loss of film, and the
idiosyncrasies associated with it.
Progress may be more efficient, but it’s nostalgia that stirs the heart.